Tiberius Gracchus – A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry

This week, we’re going to speak a bit in regards to the brothers Tiberius (trib. 133) and Gaius (trib. 123-2) Gracchus, the well-known Roman reformers of the late second century. There’s really a good bit to say about each of them, so we’re going to separate this remedy over two weeks, speaking about Tiberius this week and Gaius subsequent week.

Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus’ tribunates – each of which ended with them being killed (I feel it’s completely truthful to say ‘murdered’) – usually occupy a place in survey protection of the Roman Republic because the inciting incident that begins (if not fairly causes) the collapse of the Republic itself, the primary outbreak of violence in Roman politics, the primary escalation in a spiral that may result in the repeated outbreak of civil conflict within the first century. And that’s actually how they had been understood in antiquity; each Plutarch and Appian make this declare (App. BCiv. 1.17; Plut. Ti. Gracch. 20.1). And partly as a result of the sources (once more, Plutarch and Appian) body the Gracchi fairly positively and partly, to be frank, as a result of their reforms are typically ‘left-coded’ in a college setting that’s inherently sympathetic to left-coded issues, the Gracchi have a tendency to come back throughout to college students as righteous reformers killed by silly, hidebound and grasping reactionary Roman senators. And that’s, to be truthful, a probably legitimate studying (if employed with some caveats).

However it’s also typically the solely studying college students get and it’s not the one legitimate studying of the proof we now have. So for this week, I need to complicate the Gracchi, presenting a a few of the particulars that usually get overlooked of introductory surveys. Particularly, we’re going to focus on the issues that Tiberius Gracchus’ key legislation, the Lex Sempronia Agraria was designed to unravel and I’m going to argue that Tiberius was making an attempt to remedy an issue that didn’t exist (although he couldn’t have identified it), a view which is now fairly widespread within the scholarship however nearly totally absent in how we are inclined to train the Gracchi.

However extra to the purpose, I’m going to argue that Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus’ conduct did, actually, violate the norms of the Republic and that it was not totally unreasonable for the senatorial elite to conclude these males, of their unrestrained and nakedly bold strategy to politics, represented an actual menace to the Roman political order and that they is perhaps aiming for one thing approaching a ‘delicate coup’ within the context of a political order whose options – together with the democratic ones – labored via an unwritten structure of norms (what the Romans referred to as the mos maiorum, “the customs of the ancestors”), which each brothers actively undermined. The declare that the Gracchi threatened to make themselves tyrants was not an empty declare and that’s the darkish reflection of their position as effectively intentioned reformers.

In brief, then, if the one model of the Gracchi you might have encountered is that of the near-saintly, then martyred proto-progressive reformers, that’s not fairly the entire image (and the left-coding of their concepts is decidedly anachronistic). Naturally, in making an attempt to complicate this image, I’m basically taking the place of prosecutor, so this ‘take’ goes to be way more unfavourable on the Gracchi than how I’d, say, train them at school or, certainly, how I regard them myself.

So the best way we’re going to strategy this drawback is first to debate the issue that Tiberius Gracchus thought he was addressing (and a few of the points there), earlier than strolling via the means he used to push ahead the Lex Sempronia Agraria. Then I need to have a look at a few of the wide-ranging legal guidelines proposed by Gaius Gracchus to evaluate the diploma to which these legal guidelines cohere and methods we would perceive his program and actions, probably moderately extra negatively.

As at all times, if you happen to like what you might be studying right here, please share it; if you happen to actually prefer it, you’ll be able to assist me on Patreon. I can’t promise my supporters any ager publicus, however amici of the weblog get month-to-month updates on my analysis progress (or lack thereof), whereas patrons on the Matres et Patres Conscripti stage additionally get to vote on future subjects. If you’d like updates each time a brand new put up seems, you’ll be able to click on under for electronic mail updates, or you’ll be able to comply with me on Bluesky (@bretdevereaux.bsky.social) or Twitter (@BretDevereaux) or (much less often) Mastodon (@bretdevereaux@historians.social) for updates as to new posts in addition to my occasional historic historical past, overseas coverage or navy historical past musings; I’m most likely extra lively today on Bluesky than Twitter.

(Bibliography Notice: When you’ve got entry to it, it’s laborious for me to do higher than Sakia Roselaar’s Oxford Bibliography entry for “The Gracchi Brothers.” As Roselaar notes, nonetheless, that is an space the place – for the final reader – the bibliography that exists is unsatisfactory. The principle drawback is that, in English no less than, there has not been a sustained monograph on the Gracchi in English in fairly a while and through that point, as we’re going to see, the scholarship on some key points, notably the underlying circumstances the lex Sempronia Agraria was purported to be addressing, has modified considerably. Consequently, whereas the usual studying in English tends to be Boren, The Gracchi (1986) and Stockton, The Gracchi (1979), each pre-date these shifts. Works in different languages (Gabba’s remedy in Storia di Roma vol. 2 (1990) or Perelli, I Gracchi (1993)) are more moderen, but additionally don’t seize these shifts. In the meantime, amongst students, practically the whole lot about each brothers is the topic of no less than some debate, usually various debate. The result’s, in the intervening time, considerably unlucky: there actually isn’t, to my information, a very good place for a newbie to get an up-to-date remedy of the Gracchi, wanting studying the older works, then studying quite a lot of articles (usually in troublesome to acquire publications, many not in English) to atone for the debates. For sure, an up-to-date accessible monograph overlaying each brothers and presenting the factors of rivalry about them is desideratum.)

The Sources and Tiberius Gracchus’ Background

Now I ought to notice on the outset that our sources for the Gracchi will not be what we would like. Tiberius Gracchus’ yr as tribune was in 133 and the late second century is a interval the place our greatest sources largely lower out. Polybius, in fact, was writing within the 140s and so is unavailable for later occasions. Livy, at all times helpful, did write the historical past of this era, however it’s misplaced save for extraordinarily temporary summaries of his books referred to as the Periochae. As an alternative, we’re reliant totally on Plutarch and Appian. Each sources are writing a lot later, within the second century AD and are writing in a context the place we would query if we’re getting an totally straight narrative. As I’ve famous earlier than, Plutarch’s biographies in his Parallel Lives (of which there’s one for Tiberius Gracchus and one for Gaius Gracchus) are meant to be moralizing essays moderately than straight historic accounts and Plutarch will not be above bending the reality to suit his narrative; he additionally tends to go away out particulars in the event that they don’t match his narrative.

In the meantime, as D.J. Gargola has famous, Appian can also be bending his account of Tiberius Gracchus’ reforms, specifically by presenting the Lex Sempronia Agraria as a completely conventional, conference response to a urgent disaster. However actually, the provisions of the Lex Sempronia Agraria weren’t conventional: no comparable legislation (save for a reenactment by Gaius Gracchus) – had ever or would ever be handed in Rome and the authorized precedent that Appian presents as offering the inspiration for Tiberius’ legislation seems to be no less than considerably an anachronistic invention. In the meantime, the disaster Appian thinks Tiberius Gracchus thought he was addressing most likely didn’t exist within the kind he understood it.

However that’s what we now have, so it’s what we should work with. And we must always notice that each Plutarch and Appian are fairly favorable to the Gracchi, regardless that each males had been clearly very controversial of their day. So in a way this can be a reverse of the state of affairs we had with Cleopatra, the place we needed to cope with relentlessly unfavourable sources: right here the sources are broadly optimistic.

So, on with what we all know.

Tiberius Gracchus was elected tribune in 133. His election was already uncommon in that he appears to have run on one thing like a program (land reform, which we’ll get to); Romans typically ran on character and background moderately than promising particular political actions if elected, so this was uncommon. A part of the explanation for it was likely that Tiberius Gracchus’ political fortunes had been in difficulties. Now we must always notice right here that whereas Tiberius Gracchus was a plebian (that’s, not a patrician) that doesn’t make him a political outsider: Tiberius Gracchus was not remotely a political outsider or poor man or missing in affect. His father (additionally Ti. Sempronius Gracchus) had been consul in 177 and 163 and censor in 169; his father (or grandfather) was consul in 215 and 213. Our Tiberius Gracchus’ mom, Cornelia, was the daughter of P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus, the person who defeated Hannibal. Tiberius Gracchus was born into substantial wealth and affect, the type of man whose eventual political ascent was nearly assured.

(Certainly, it was so assured that he will get to bend the foundations and maintain a lot of his places of work early. He’s quaestor at simply 26, which suggests that he began his navy service at 15 or 16 as a substitute of the conventional 17, doing in order a navy tribune, not a standard soldier. I do assume that is related to understanding Tiberius Gracchus: this was a person born with a silver spoon and a rigorously paved, flat-and-easy street to energy and affect laid out for him by his household and his political backers, essentially the most notable amongst whom was his key supporter Scipio Aemilianus (destroyer of Carthage and shortly Numantia).)

Besides. Besides he bought wrapped up in one thing of a nasty overseas coverage scandal throughout his yr as quaestor, when he was assigned to the amazingly named however much less amazingly succesful C. Hostilius Mancinus who as consul in 137 was purported to take care of Numantia in Spain. Mancinus blew it and bought his military successfully trapped and despatched Tiberius – his quaestor and the subsequent highest rating Roman current – to barter to get his military out. Tiberius did this, however the entire thing precipitated an ideal stink and a scandal at Rome (Roman armies are purported to go down preventing, not negotiate shameful retreats!). Certainly, the Senate was so enraged they rejected the treaty and as a substitute despatched Mancinus, certain in chains, to the Numantines as a part of a ritual course of by which his treaty was disowned. Tiberius doesn’t get packed off to Numantia, however a few of the political stink does rub off on him, so whereas he’s linked sufficient to get elected as a plebeian tribune in 133, he should know he wants a massive second act to get his political profession again on observe, or he might by no means attain the consulship. That context – a political insider who had a golden ticket however should now win it again, moderately than an outdoor with out connections – is essential for understanding the response he’s going to get.

The Supposed Land Disaster

The problem Tiberius Gracchus seizes on is land reform and each Plutarch (Ti. Gracch. 8.1-3) and Appian (B Civ 7-8) current comparable visions of the issue he thought he was addressing. When Rome had expanded in Italy, it had usually taken land from defeated enemies, a few of which was resettled or offered, however a few of which was stored as ‘public land’ (ager publicus), leased out by the state at very favorable charges. By the late second century, Tiberius Gracchus and others are observing two conjoined info: on the one hand, the variety of Romans eligible for conscription (the assidui) has begun to say no. On the different hand, town of Rome itself is more and more stuffed with landless poor searching for labor and hoping for some choice that can give them an opportunity at land.

What they assume is going down is that the wealthiest Romans – who’ve, actually, grown fantastically rich from Rome’s abroad wars – have used that wealth to amass a lot of the land, both shopping for up the small freeholds of smaller Roman farmers or getting the leases for that public land. In the meantime, the Roman small farmer class does most of Rome’s preventing and so the belief – by Appian – is that these guys are being floor underfoot by heavy navy deployments, though as finest we are able to inform, navy deployments within the 150s, 140s and 130s are considerably lighter than these from 218-168 (however they’re additionally in much less worthwhile, tougher locations like Spain, put a pin in that). These rich Romans then work the land not with free laborers, however with slaves, as a result of Roman conquests – keep in mind, we’re on the tail finish of Rome’s ‘iron century’ of conquests from 264 to 148 – have introduced huge numbers of enslaved laborers to Italy. These poor Romans, now displaced, haven’t any land and flock to Rome and are now not responsible for the Roman census.

Besides discover the information factors getting used to give you this story: the seen inhabitants of landless males in Rome and the Roman census returns. However, as we’ve mentioned, the Roman census is self-reported, and the report of a little bit of wealth like a small farm is what makes a person responsible for taxes and conscription.

In brief the story we now have above is an interpretation of the out there information however not the one one and each our sources and Tiberius Gracchus merely lack the instruments mandatory to collect the data they’d have to sound out if their interpretation is right.

All of which now, eventually, brings us to the scholarship of the final a number of many years which has, by and enormous, concluded that Tiberius Gracchus most likely misunderstood the character of Roman social and financial issues within the late second century and consequently utilized the fallacious answer. The preliminary drawback is that the above mannequin assumes a principally stagnant Italian inhabitants: you’re simply shifting folks round, not producing new folks. However survey archaeology exhibits rising city facilities and new land coming below cultivation, suggesting a modestly rising inhabitants, a conclusion strengthened by demographic modeling which acknowledges the possible marked decline in navy mortality within the again half of the second century. Furthermore, the huge enlargement of villa estates we should be seeing on this interval actually solely comes later, within the first century BC and the primary two centuries AD; there’s some enlargement (and these patterns are very regionalized) however not sufficient to elucidate what we’re being advised is occurring. These observations, rising within the 90s and early 2000s, offered the mandatory proof to vindicate the idea superior by J.W. Wealthy within the Nineteen Eighties that the issue was fairly completely different than Tiberius Gracchus understood, partly to elucidate the one curious truth we may at all times see about Tiberius’ land reforms, which is that they occurred, they went forward as deliberate and in addition they didn’t repair the issue.

As an alternative what is occurring is that this: Roman navy deployments had, for a very long time, been large. Rome had careened from the key Samnite Wars (343–341, 326–304, and 298–290) to the high-casualty Pyrrhic Struggle (280-275) to the a lot larger casualty First (264-241) and Second (218-201) Punic Wars. However the massive wars of the early second century had concerned much more successful and thus considerably much less dying (deaths from illness at all times outweighed fight losses, however Roman armies are smaller from 201-168, so much less illness dying too), whereas after the Third Macedonian Struggle (171-168), Rome doesn’t have any extra peer-opponent wars left to battle and so the variety of males below arms declines once more after 168 and particularly after 148. Roman society was thus structured to maintain itself in a state of affairs the place navy mortality for males was excessive. After which it dropped.

However recall the common Roman farm is small, so what you might have now are abruptly an entire bunch of second and third sons who between 350 and 201 would have gone off to battle and died (or their elder brother would have) however at the moment are alive, however can’t attainable inherit the household farm as a result of they’ve a dwelling brother and the farm is way too small to separate additional (or to assist a whole second nuclear household unit). The place do they go? Effectively, to Rome, in fact, the place they need what Rome has performed prior to now to take care of this type of drawback: the inspiration of recent Roman communities (colonies) the place they will have land. However there isn’t any Italy left to overcome (Rome controls all of it) and we aren’t but to founding Roman colonies abroad, so not solely is the mortality a lot decrease (and so you might have extra of those guys) the normal launch valve is caught. So that they’re piling up within the one place that there’s significant quantity of wage labor out there (town of Rome), the place they’re very seen to the Roman ruling elite.

In the meantime, Elder Brother-Who-Lived is again on the farm and will, in concept, nonetheless be eligible for call-up. However whereas in earlier many years he may hope to get despatched to battle in locations like Greece or Italy or towards Carthage the place the rewards in loot from defeating rich enemies had been substantial, within the 130s, the primary drawback was Numantia: a Celtiberian neighborhood perched in a very troublesome hillfort in a comparatively poor, troublesome a part of Spain. Campaigns to take the place usually failed (see above) however even when they succeeded, there can be little actual loot. Furthermore, a scarcity of success made the wars deeply unpopular. Elder Brother doesn’t need to get drafted to go battle in Spain, it’s simply not a very good cut price for him (in contrast to earlier wars).

However he has an answer: the census is self-reported. Whereas his youthful brothers are in Rome searching for work, he can simply not report the farm on the census (or not report his navy aged son), understating his wealth to drop under the qualifying requirement for navy service. As a result of the Roman census pays functionally no consideration to such males – the capite censi (these counted by their heads) – Elder Brother’s family nearly appears to fade within the census returns and the variety of males responsible for conscription ticks down by one.

And so you might have falling census returns, mixed with crowds of poor Romans within the metropolis of Rome, however with out it essentially having something to do with ager publicus or misplaced farms. And that is, we predict, most likely what is occurring: certainly there may be some elite villa-estate enlargement and some alternative of freeholding farmers with enslaved employees on that land however actually the issue the Romans are going through is basic land shortage with a rising inhabitants, however they don’t know that’s the issue as a result of draft-resistance seems within the census as inhabitants decline and the census is all they’ve.

However you’ll be able to see instantly the issue for Tiberius Gracchus’ land reform: whereas there may be actually some ager publicus to redistribute (to the nice annoyance of the elites holding it), they’re not sufficient, as a result of the core of this drawback isn’t altering land use patterns (extra villas, much less small farms) however rising inhabitants creating financial pressure on the backside (whereas, it’s true, imperial enlargement creates huge nearly unimaginable quantities of wealth on the high).

However we’re really not fairly performed with issues, there’s yet another: not all the ager publicus was being farmed by Romans. Various it appears, as a substitute, to have been within the arms of native Italians – the socii. That is one other handy simplification by Appian and Plutarch, a product of them each writing within the imperial interval lengthy after citizenship had been prolonged throughout Italy. However that hasn’t occurred but. So any legislation to redistribute ager publicus would imply taking land from the socii who had been at the moment utilizing it for a land-giveaway wherein solely Roman residents will likely be eligible.

It’s possible you’ll effectively think about that doing one thing like that may actually injury relations with the socii and in addition essentially change the ‘cut price’ by which the Roman alliance system functioned, as earlier than Tiberius Gracchus, the socii appear to have been eligable to settle in Roman colonial foundations on conquered land, however they may not be eligible to get land in Tiberius Gracchus’ land reform invoice.

You may rapidly flip ahead to the year 91 to see how that seems in the long term.

Tiberius Gracchus’ Tribunate (133)

Tiberius Gracchus’ proposal to repair this drawback was the lex Sempronia Agraria. The legislation proposed to implement a authorized however lengthy ignored restrict on the holding of ager publicus, limiting people to holding simply 500 iugera (c. 311 acres), with the state revoking the leases on the rest and utilizing the reclaimed land to then present small plots totally free to the Roman poor, with a rider that these plots couldn’t be offered (to keep away from them being reconsolidated into elite estates).

And right here it’s price noting that sort of authorities the Romans needed to perceive the response. The Roman Republic had written legal guidelines however no written structure – as a substitute, the foundations for workplace holding, for conducting the enterprise of the Senate, for operating the assemblies and so forth had been all customary: the Romans ruled themselves in accordance with what they referred to as the mos maiorum, “the customized of the ancestors.” In a way then, sure practices, if practiced lengthy sufficient, grew to become a type of law-of-tradition to themselves and naturally a kind of customs – practiced at this level for, at minimal round 150 years – was the continuous leasing of huge quantities of ager publicus to the purpose that the leases had been handled as a type of possession: folks used that land as safety for loans, they constructed homes on it, they buried their dad and mom on it and so forth. As a result of the leases had been presumptively renewable and had been for many years if not centuries, below the mos maiorum, the holders of ager publicus had lengthy thought of the land theirs. And naturally the upset events are wealthy and highly effective, so their opposition was vital and significant, politically.

Briefly, the best way this performs out is that whereas Tiberius Gracchus does have vital fashionable assist for his movement (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 9.1), a lot of the elite are opposed. He attracts up a fairly conciliatory model of the legislation, which proposes to compensate the holders of huge quantities of ager publicus for his or her misplaced leasing rights and to then give them the rest of their leased land (in order that they needn’t worry a second lex agraria and a 3rd and a fourth and so forth), however based on Plutarch within the face of continued elite opposition, shifts again to a much less conciliatory model of the legislation (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 10.3). The resistance to his legislation facilities on one other tribune, Marcus Octavius, himself a big holder of public lands, who plans to veto the legislation and makes use of his personal powers as a tribune to disrupt the method (together with some pretty clear shenanigans by a few of the rich, like making an attempt to cover the voting urns to stop a vote on the legislation and so forth).

Now there are some things to notice at this juncture within the story. First, there being ten tribunes, it must not ever have been very laborious to discover a tribute keen to gum up the passage of a given legislation, however that, historically, this was a tactic of delay, moderately than a hard-stop the best way Octavius is utilizing it. On the similar time, with actual public momentum to make this legislation occur, one may simply think about merely ready Octavius out – he solely has one yr in workplace. Besides. Besides that, keep in mind, Tiberius Gracchus wants a massive victory in his tribunate to get his political profession on observe, a consideration that was clearly vital (thus the explanation we’re knowledgeable of his quaestorship; we normally don’t know a lot about even very vital determine’s time in junior places of work!). That consideration, I feel, serves as essential context for Tiberius’ determination to escalate each time he encounters resistance: he can’t afford to easily be the prelude to another person passing this legislation: he must cross it himself.

The conventional methodology for ‘deconflicting’ two magistrates with opposing vetoes like this was to go to the Senate, which Tiberius Gracchus, hoping his influential supporters would carry the day, did. As an alternative, based on Plutarch (Ti. Gracch. 11.2) the Senate was merely no assist, whereas Appian (BCiv 1.12) describes the Senate as overtly upbraiding Tiberius, a powerful unfavourable response. Now below the mos maiorum, that may be the top of it: the authority of the Senate (the auctoritas senatus) should be so intense that when the Senate speaks in a single voice and says, “not proper now” then you definately desist. Keep in mind that within the Roman conception, the Republic is a partnership of kinds between the Senate and the Folks (the S and the P in SPQR), moderately than a state of affairs wherein the Senate is only subordinate to the favored will: if the Senate is strongly opposed, that’s purported to be a veto level that’s revered.

However keep in mind: Tiberius Gracchus can’t, politically, desist. He should push via as a result of his political profession requires a victory this yr. Notice that the trigger doesn’t require a victory in 133; there may be nothing to cease one other tribune in 132 from making an attempt to advance the identical invoice or a extra restricted or completely different model of it. However Tiberius Gracchus’ profession completely requires success in 133. So as a substitute of desisting, he escalates.

He now breaks clearly with the mos maiorum and plans to take his legislation on to the folks towards the recommendation of the Senate. Octavius is clearly an issue – he’ll veto something Tiberius Gracchus tries to do – so Tiberius Gracchus introduces a legislation to depose Octavius from workplace. The Roman Republic doesn’t have something like impeachment, there isn’t any framework to take away somebody from workplace. As an alternative, the best way the Republic works is that all the places of work are held for brief period (one yr) and whereas tribunes and workplace holders with imperium are immune from prosecution whereas in workplace, they are often prosecuted the second they go away workplace for any crimes they dedicated. There isn’t any framework for booting out a tribune like this; the treatment within the customary Roman system is to verify the subsequent yr you choose tribunes who assist the concept and attempt to cross it then. However that treatment doesn’t work for Tiberius Gracchus.

So Tiberius Gracchus passes the legislation deposing Octavius after which has him dragged from the speaker’s platform (the rostra) and now we now have an issue. Due to course Octavius’ supporters are going to view this legislation itself as unlawful and invalid: tribunes are, you’ll recall sacrosanct, so it’s not clear they are often deposed and it’s very clear they can’t be assaulted or dragged. Violating the sacrosanctity of a tribune is, no less than notionally, a capital offense and a extreme violation of faith and if you happen to assume that Tiberius Gracchus’ authorized foundation for all of that is garbage, you assume he simply did it twice. After all, Tiberius is additionally a tribune, so you’ll be able to’t assault him now, however as soon as his yr is finished, you might be most likely planning to haul him in to court docket and let a jury determine if what he did was authorized or not.

In any case, with Octavius eliminated, Tiberius passes his land reform invoice. The legislation offered for a three-man fee to deal with the evaluation of what public land was held in extra after which handy it out. Tiberius Gracchus names as these commissioners himself, his brother and his father-in-law (Appius Claudius Pulcher (cos. 143)). For sure, that may be a set of commissioners which doesn’t encourage quite a lot of confidence that the fee will likely be uncorrupted by politics, a degree we’ll get again to in only a second.

Within the meantime, the Senate appeared to exert its traditional prerogative over state funds (because it suggested the quaestors who superintended the treasury) to hamstring the brand new fee, however Tiberius Gracchus took benefit of the latest dying of Attalus III, King of Pergamum. Attalus had notionally willed his kingdom ‘to the Roman folks’ – he had no clear heirs and so maybe thought by this act to get the Romans to select one among his kin to run the dominion, thus avoiding a harmful civil conflict – however as a substitute Tiberius, getting the information early, rushed to cross a legislation annexing the dominion and utilizing the windfall to fund his fee. The legislation passes, however this can be a breach each of the Senate’s conventional energy over state funds, but additionally its crucial position managing Roman overseas coverage.

What I need to notice on this sequence which is essential for understanding what comes subsequent is that Tiberius Gracchus has simply demonstrated that, as long as he remained fashionable, he may use the powers of the tribunate to basically run the Roman state from the tribune’s chair. Tiberius has now compelled not merely a home land difficulty, but additionally a finance difficulty and a overseas coverage difficulty over the objection of the Senate and one other elected tribune, basically operating roughshod over all the customary limits meant to maintain any one Roman politician from coming to dominate the Roman political system.

After all if you happen to had been an opponent of Tiberius Gracchus, you may no less than inform your self that that is all unhealthy, however on the very least, Tiberius Gracchus will likely be out of workplace subsequent yr, because it was opposite to customized to run for any workplace instantly after holding it. Certainly, it was uncommon to carry principally any workplace greater than as soon as, save for the consulship (and even then, just for very profitable consuls and by no means a number of years in a row). These limits are customary however the whole lot in regards to the Roman Republic is customary; if you happen to discounted the mos maiorum, there wouldn’t be any republic left. You’d as a substitute count on that Tiberius would return to being a senator for a couple of years whereas planning his shot on the praetorship – throughout which he’ll need to survive a sequence of court docket battles over the legality of his actions.

So even when he’s doing probably outrageous, harmful issues, no less than he’ll be gone in a yr, proper?

The Elections for 132

So Tiberius Gracchus pronounces he intends to run for the tribunate for 132 and all hell breaks unfastened.

When the day for the election comes, there’s evidently a dispute among the many tribunes over if Tiberius Gracchus may even run (App. BCiv. 1.14), which Tiberius might not have been successful, whereas the voting crowd bought rowdy and there appear to have been difficulties in finishing up the vote (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 17-18). On the similar time, the Senate met on the Temple of Fides, on the Capitoline proper by the place the voting would have been going down, making an attempt to determine what to do in regards to the impending chaos. They’d bear in mind that fights had been breaking out within the voting under and that the gang was getting uncontrolled (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 18.1) and maybe rumors that the elections had been disrupted and that Tiberius Gracchus had declared himself a tribune anyway (App. BCiv. 1.15).

Within the Senate assembly, the senators, led by Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio (cos. 138; pont. max. 141-132) demanded the consuls take motion, fearing that Tiberius Gracchus was making an attempt to overthrow the state. Reportedly, the consul current (Publius Mucius Scaevola, cos. 133 and a supporter of Gracchus) responded with prevarication (Plut. Ti Gracch. 19.3) saying he’d throw out the outcomes of the vote if it was unlawful, however maybe not specifying if that meant he’d rule Tiberius himself an illegal candidate. Scipio Nasica, maybe assuming that this type of prevaricating inaction was meant to let Tiberius ‘steal a march’ and make himself tribune anyway, as a substitute pulled up his toga (‘capite velato‘ (“with head veiled”), a gesture indicating he was embarking, in his workplace as Pontifex Maximus, on a spiritual ritual (on this case a ritual homicide) and lead the Senate out (presumably with a lot of their shoppers) as a mob to cease Tiberius Gracchus.

That mob of senators, with makeshift weapons, met an equally makeshift mob round Tiberius Gracchus (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 19.1) and within the ensuing road battle with golf equipment and fists, Tiberius Gracchus is killed.

And on the one hand, I feel it’s straightforward to see how this will get simplified all the way down to the simple narrative of the martyred reformer in a classroom setting: Tiberius Gracchus proposed a legislation to assist the poor which might have mildly inconvenienced the wealthy they usually killed him for it. And that’s not fallacious however it’s incomplete.

Take into account the matter from the angle of one other senator and even only a common Roman who didn’t assist Tiberius Gracchus.

Tiberius Gracchus had spent the primary half of 133 demonstrating that if you happen to had been keen to exceed the customary limits on the facility of the tribune, that as long as you had been fashionable and charismatic, it was attainable to subvert the complete state. In brief, Tiberius Gracchus had performed a six-month practicum on methods to rule the Roman Republic as a tyrant with simply the powers of a tribune. If that sounds absurd, let me remind you that the authorized foundation for the home powers of the Roman emperors will likely be a easy grant of tribunicia potestas – the powers of the tribunate. It was a very highly effective workplace, constrained by the customary sense of its restricted targets and objective and the belief that except the tribunes had been performing as a physique on behalf of the folks, that they’d be deferential to the Senate.

Now Tiberius Gracchus’ land fee was going to grind into gear, handing out free land (and gear and provides to construct farms on it) to Roman residents. Beneath Roman social customs, these residents may have turn out to be, by that act, shoppers of Tiberius Gracchus – or of the opposite two commissioners, who’re, I ought to notice, his brother and father-in-law – so Tiberius Gracchus is about to make use of state funds to mint 1000’s of voters who’re, by the bonds of Roman tradition, loyal to him – they are going to be certain by Roman honor tradition, to vote for him.

Now if Tiberius Gracchus meant to comply with the traditions of Roman workplace holding, that may not be too unhealthy. His charisma, shoppers and affect would possibly or may not get him out of the powerful authorized fights forward, however even when he survived the inevitable trial for deposing Octavius, he’d be at most yet another influential Roman, one among a number of: he’d win the praetorship and the consulship simply, positive, however get one yr of every, biking again into the Senate the place his voice would carry quite a lot of weight, however hardly be the one voice. He can be a determine of the type of affect of his personal patron, Scipio Aemilianus.

All of which is why I feel that violence solely breaks out when he tries to run for a second time period. Tiberius Gracchus had, in fact, simply demonstrated how highly effective a tribune may very well be who was keen to make use of these powers to the fullest after which by declaring his intention to run for a second consecutive time period, his intent to probably by no means quit this energy. And there have been ten spots for the tribune: the possibilities of denying a determine as fashionable as Tiberius Gracchus – with a in-built mass of recent shoppers who’re honor-bound to assist him – had been principally non-existent. Having breached the no-consecutive-office-holding norm as soon as, there was no purpose he couldn’t hold operating and hold successful.

Which might imply Tiberius Gracchus operating the state from the tribune’s chair, immune from prosecution, completely.

After which you might have the occasion itself, the place Tiberius’ supporters – because the voting is ready to get underway and the tribunes and senate try to determine if Tiberius even can run – get violent. Appian and Plutarch inform us that when the magistrates (with their lictors, who carried the fasces, the emblems of state authority) tried to face in Tiberius’ means into the voting house (on the grounds that his candidacy is perhaps unlawful – one thing that was being actively debated by the tribunes, you’ll recall), his supporters seized their fasces and damaged them, beating them and forcing them from the voting place with such violence that lots of the different tribunes flee and it’s in that context that the Senate is listening to rumors that maybe Tiberius has deposed the opposite tribunes or declared himself tribune with out an election (App. BCiv. 1.15) or – worst but – (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 19.1) that he had motioned to his head to demand a crown, they panic that what’s actually taking place is a coup, that Tiberius is desiring to seize extra-constitutional energy.

As a result of if you happen to had been going to do it, that is precisely how you’ll do it. Certainly, because the Roman senators may hardly have been unaware by this level, this was the usual means for tyrants to grab energy in Greek poleis.

And I feel that’s essential to know what we’re advised subsequent, which is that the Romans themselves had been, within the second, deeply divided about what had simply occurred. Some, we’re advised, mourned deeply, however equally Appian reviews rejoicing (App. BCiv 1.17). In keeping with Plutarch (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 21.4), Scipio Aemilianus – Tiberius Gracchus’ most essential supporter, off besieging Numantia in 133 – when he heard of Tiberius Gracchus dying, responded with a line of Homer (Ody 1.43), ὡς ἀπόλοιτο καὶ ἄλλος, ὅτις τοιαῦτά γε ῥέζοι, “So too might perish totally, every other who does such issues.” That quip, we’re advised, value Scipio Aemilianus a lot of his favor with the folks, however it’s hanging coming from a person who was one among his strongest backers and but concluded at Tiberius Gracchus’ dying that he ought to have been killed for what he had performed (and so too any who tried once more after him).

Remembering Tiberius Gracchus

Now even on this run-down, it’s not laborious to see the Tiberius Gracchus most college students will acknowledge: the well-meaning reformer who noticed an issue – the poor being crushed underfoot – and aimed to unravel it and when his answer ran afoul of the elite he was murdered for it.

However there may be one other Tiberius Gracchus.

The Tiberius Gracchus who misdiagnosed a non-existent drawback after which proposed an answer that, as we’ll see subsequent week, didn’t do a lot to unravel that drawback (notably, the Lex Sempronia Agraria was not repealed after Tiberius’ dying, however staffed, funded and allowed to go ahead) however did arrange an much more vital future disaster. This he might have performed as a result of he cared deeply in regards to the poor however equally he might have performed it as a result of he was an extraordinarily elite Roman himself whose door to energy and affect – as soon as broad open and simple – was swiftly swinging shut and such a dramatic political agenda was mandatory to avoid wasting his profession, the republic be damned (a motive, I’ll notice, that Plutarch admits to listening to rumored, Plut. Ti. Gracch. 8.6). In the meantime, opposite to Appian, the reform he proposed was hardly conventional, however a radical revision of how the Roman state redistributed land to its residents, one which might play an element in degrading the Roman relationship with the socii.

In that pursuit – once more, of a misguided reform that may not remedy the issue it didn’t perceive – Tiberius Gracchus ruptured the (unwritten) constitutional construction of the Republic, demonstrating that one may use the powers of the tribunate mixed with a dedicated physique of followers to successfully run the Roman state out of the tribune’s meeting (the concilium plebis) in defiance of the Senate and even, if mandatory, in defiance of different tribunes. It’s price not forgetting that Marcus Octavius who Tiberius Gracchus deposed was each bit as elected as Tiberius.

After which, there actually isn’t any means round saying it: Tiberius Gracchus does the whole lot one would do if he was planning to set himself up as a tyrant. Having stocked his land fee with a committee of himself and his kin, he runs for a second time period in violation of customized to his highly effective workplace whereas his supporters deploy as a mob chasing different officers away from the voting. That is, to be clear, what the pro-Tiberius Gracchus sources inform us (Plut. Ti. Gracch. 19.1; App. BCiv 1.15).

None of which must be taken as a protection of Marcus Octavius or Scipio Nasica. On this second, as in subsequent moments, the conservative Roman aristocracy of the Late Republic demonstrates its nice flaw: it could sacrifice the whole lot to be able to compromise nothing. There have been apparent off-ramps that might have been taken on this confrontation which don’t appear to have been tried. Tiberius Gracchus’ earlier, extra conciliatory model of the legislation fell by the wayside, but additionally as soon as the agrarian legislation was handed the Senate may have signaled that they’d not countenance its repeal, eradicating the general public justification Tiberius had for operating once more (to guard the legislation that had handed). It’s not clear to me if Tiberius Gracchus would have taken such a deal, however it could have been revealing of his motives both means.

As an alternative, Scipio Nasica takes a nasty state of affairs and makes is a lot worse. One of many nice counter-factuals of this second, in fact is what if Scipio Aemilianus had been in Rome as a substitute of besieging Numantia: a supporter and pal of Tiberius Gracchus however evidently additionally alarmed by his actions, one wonders if Aemilianus may have used his great reputation and affect to dealer a much less violent, destabilizing decision.

Appian renders his judgement on Tiberius Gracchus that he died, “on account of a wonderful proposal he pursued with violence,” placing the ultimate blame not on Scipio Nasica however on Tiberius Gracchus, and naturally we should once more notice that Appian is, actually, fudging his particulars to make Tiberius’ proposal look extra cheap and conventional than it really was.

Tiberius Gracchus was not an uncomplicatedly optimistic reformer determine, however a messy political determine whose actions would have been harmful even had they succeeded, whose motivations are at finest doubtful and who shook the republic to its foundations in pursuit of a poorly thought out reform to handle both an issue which didn’t exist (the land disaster) or existed for just one man (Tiberius Gracchus’ political profession). Curse the folly of Scipio Nasica, however reward Tiberius Gracchus solely with warning and caveats.

As, we’ll see, will likely be much more true for his much less compromising, extra violent and fiery brother.